| NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | NOTE 14 |
|
|
| 14. |
PROPERTY ASSETS |
| |
(refer to property portfolio section on page 80) |
| |
|
2015
Rm |
|
2014
Rm |
|
| 14.1 |
Fair value of investment property for accounting purposes |
|
|
|
|
| |
Opening fair value of property assets |
69 648 |
|
53 686 |
|
| |
Additions at cost — acquisitions |
753 |
|
3 942 |
|
| |
|
— acquisitions – Acucap and Sycom portfolio |
18 586 |
|
– |
|
| |
|
— acquisitions – Tiber portfolio |
660 |
|
5 379 |
|
| |
|
— acquisitions – Abseq portfolio |
– |
|
1 343 |
|
| |
|
— development expenditure |
1 478 |
|
869 |
|
| |
|
— capital expenditure |
712 |
|
590 |
|
| |
Disposals at fair value |
(701) |
|
(171) |
|
| |
Transferred to investment property reclassified as held for sale (note 14.3) |
(539) |
|
(265) |
|
| |
Reclassified – previously held for sale (note 14.3) |
109 |
|
69 |
|
| |
Foreign exchange (loss)/gain |
(1 205) |
|
1 640 |
|
| |
Gross fair value adjustment on investment property |
3 534 |
|
2 566 |
|
| |
Property valuation |
93 035 |
|
69 648 |
|
| |
Less: straight-line lease income adjustment (note 14.2) |
(2 118) |
|
(2 021) |
|
| |
Fair value of investment property for accounting purposes |
90 917 |
|
67 627 |
|
| |
Straight-line lease income adjustment |
2 118 |
|
2 021 |
|
| |
Closing fair value of property assets |
93 035 |
|
69 648 |
|
| |
– cost |
73 327 |
|
53 388 |
|
| |
– cumulative fair value surplus |
19 708 |
|
16 260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Securities
Mortgage bonds have been registered over South African investment property, including investment property reclassified as held for sale,
with a fair value of R43 253 million (FY14: R26 382 million) as security for non-current interest-bearing liabilities at a nominal value amounting
to R20 703 million (FY14: R11 457 million).
First mortgage bonds have been registered over Australian investment property, including investment property reclassified as held for sale, with
a fair value of AUD2 283 million or R21 442 million (FY14: AUD2 037 million or R20 297 million). Additional security was also provided in the
form of other current assets to a value of AUD124 million or R1 170 million (FY14: AUD92 million or R913 million).
Valuation of investment properties
In terms of the Group’s accounting policy, at least 75% of fair value of investment properties should be determined by external, independent
property valuers, having appropriate recognised professional qualifications and recent experience in the location and category of the property
being valued.
The balance of the South African portfolio was valued by Growthpoint’s qualified internal valuers.
The South African properties were valued at 30 June 2015 using the discounted cash flow of future income streams method by the following
valuers who are all registered valuers in terms of section 19 of the Property Valuers Professional Act, No 47 of 2000:
| Mills Fitchet PWV |
PG Mitchell |
N Dip (Prop Val), MIV (SA), CIEA, Professional valuer |
| Mills Fitchet KZN |
T Bate |
MSc, BSc Land Econ (UK), MRICS, MIV (SA), Professional valuer |
| ERIS |
C Everatt |
BSc (Hons) Estate management, MRICS, MIV (SA), Professional valuer |
| Glenross |
AG Rostovsky |
MIV (SA), MRICS, Professional valuer, Appraiser |
| Old Mutual Properties |
T King |
BSc DipSurv, MRICS Valuer (SA), Professional valuer |
| Jones Lang LaSalle |
R Long |
BSc, MBA, MRICS, Professional valuer |
| Broll |
S Wolffs |
N Dip (Prop Val), Professional associate valuer |
| Rode and Associates |
K Scott |
BCom (Hons), MRICS, Professional valuer |
| PropVal Assist |
C van Rooyen |
N Dip (Prop Val), MRICS, MIV (SA), Professional valuer |
| Spectrum |
PL O’Connell |
N Dip (Prop Val), Professional valuer |
| LDM |
FV Amaed |
Professional associate valuer |
| Mills Fitchet Magnus Penny (Cape) |
MRB Gibbons |
N Dip (Prop Val), MRICS, MIV (SA), Professional valuer |
| Quadrant Properties |
P Parfitt |
N Dip (Prop Val), MIV (SA), Professional valuer |
The Australian properties were valued at 30 June 2015 using the discounted cash flow of future income streams method by Savills, Jones Lang
LaSalle, Urbis, Knight Frank, CBRE and LandMark White who are all members of the Australian Property Institute and Certified Practising Valuers. |
| |
|
2015
% |
|
2014
% |
|
| |
At the reporting date, the key assumptions and unobservable inputs used by the Group in
determining fair value were in the following ranges for the Group’s portfolio of properties: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Retail sector |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discount rate |
12.5 – 15.5 |
|
12.3 – 15.8 |
|
| |
Exit capitalisation rate |
6.8 – 10.3 |
|
6.8 – 10.3 |
|
| |
Capitalisation rate |
6.8 – 10.0 |
|
6.8 – 10.0 |
|
| |
Office sector |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discount rate |
12.8 – 16.0 |
|
13.3 – 16.5 |
|
| |
Exit capitalisation rate |
7.5 – 10.0 |
|
7.8 – 12.5 |
|
| |
Capitalisation rate |
7.5 – 10.0 |
|
7.8 – 11.5 |
|
| |
Industrial sector |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discount rate |
13.8 – 17.3 |
|
13.0 – 17.5 |
|
| |
Exit capitalisation rate |
8.0 – 12.0 |
|
8.3 – 13.0 |
|
| |
Capitalisation rate |
8.0 – 12.0 |
|
8.0 – 12.5 |
|
| |
GOZ Office |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discount rate |
8.0 – 10.3 |
|
8.5 – 10.5 |
|
| |
Terminal yield |
7.3 – 11.8 |
|
7.5 – 10.5 |
|
| |
Capitalisation rate |
6.8 – 12.0 |
|
7.0 – 12.0 |
|
| |
GOZ Industrial |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discount rate |
8.0 – 10.0 |
|
9.0 – 10.3 |
|
| |
Terminal yield |
6.8 – 11.5 |
|
7.5 – 10.3 |
|
| |
Capitalisation rate |
6.5 – 9.8 |
|
7.3 – 9.8 |
|
| |
South African portfolio
Commentary on discount rates
The discount rate applied was derived using an appropriate capitalisation rate and adding a growth rate based on market-related rentals, testing
this for reasonableness by comparing the resultant Rand rate per m² against comparative sales of similar properties in similar locations.
Commentary on capitalisation rates
Investor interest in properties across all sectors remains robust with competition having increased for the small amount of prime stock that does
come onto the market. As a result of this, yields have firmed in general, especially in the prime market. Average capitalisation rates and discount
rates have compressed over the year to take this trend into account.
Commentary on expected vacancy periods and rental growth rates
Historic trends with regard to vacancy periods experienced on the re-letting of vacant space, coupled with the emphasis on tenant retention,
indicate that the expected vacancy period applied in the 2015 valuation best approximates the actual experience. With inherent in-force rental
increases at above 7.7% per annum (FY14: 8%) and expense growth stabilised, the expected rental growth rate for the 2015 valuations is considered
reasonable.
Commentary on Acucap and Sycom portfolio
Mills Fitchet Magnus Penny (Cape) and Quadrant Properties valued the Acucap and Sycom properties at 31 March 2015 using methods that were
consistent with Growthpoint’s valuation method. The relevant people and qualifications are included in the listing above. Values established at
31 March 2015 were used as the values of the properties at 30 June 2015.
GOZ portfolio
Commentary on discount rates |
|
|
|
|
| Date of valuation |
30 June 2015
% |
|
30 June 2014
% |
|
| Weighted average 10-year discount rate used to value the GOZ’s properties |
8.50 |
|
9.15 |
|
| 10-year bond rate |
3.00 |
|
3.54 |
|
| Implied property risk premium |
5.50 |
|
5.61 |
|
As the above table shows, over the 12 months to 30 June 2015 discount rates utilised in the valuation of the GOZ property portfolio have
tightened (lowered) although the spread has remained mostly static. At the reporting date, the weighted average discount rate utilised in valuing
the GOZ portfolio of property has decreased by approximately 65 basis points. Over this same period the implied property risk premium has
reduced by approximately 11 basis points. The implied property risk premium is the difference between the weighted average discount rate and
the 10-year Australian Government bond rate. The decrease in the implied property risk premium is driven by the tightening of the GOZ weighted
average discount rate, which outweighed the reduction in the bond rate of 54 basis points from June 2014 following a recovery from the low levels
in March 2015.
Commentary on capitalisation rates
Industrial
There continues to be strong interest in the industrial property sector, as transactions indicate domestic and foreign institutional investors
compete for limited prime quality stock and secondary quality stock. This has led to further firming of yields over the past 12 months of 50 to 100
basis points for both ends of the prime yield range and the higher quality end of secondary yields. These transactions have provided good evidence
for the Group’s own industrial properties which reduced the weighted average capitalisation rate used to value the industrial portfolio from 8.0%
to 7.3% over the year to 30 June 2015.
Office
Over the past two to three years, the commercial property market has experienced solid investment activity from both domestic and international
institutional investors, predominantly for A-grade office assets, which has led to firmer yields. However, in contrast to the buoyant investment
metrics, office leasing conditions remain challenging. Following some new leasing deals, lease extensions to existing tenants and a strong investment
market, the weighted average capitalisation rate used in valuing the office portfolio has firmed from 7.8% to 7.3% over the year to 30 June 2015. |
| |
|
2015
Rm |
|
2014
Rm |
|
| 14.2 |
Straight-line lease income adjustment |
|
|
|
|
| |
Opening balance |
2 021 |
|
1 778 |
|
| |
Arising during the year |
130 |
|
193 |
|
| |
Foreign exchange (loss)/gain |
(33) |
|
50 |
|
| |
|
2 118 |
|
2 021 |
|
| 14.3 |
Investment property reclassified as held for sale |
|
|
|
|
| |
Opening fair value of property held for sale |
265 |
|
545 |
|
| |
Properties no longer held for sale — reclassified as investment property (note 14.1) |
(109) |
|
(69) |
|
| |
Transferred from investment property (note 14.1) |
539 |
|
265 |
|
| |
Additions at cost – capital expenditure |
1 |
|
4 |
|
| |
Proceeds on disposals |
(157) |
|
(480) |
|
| |
Closing fair value of property held for sale |
539 |
|
265 |
|
| |
– cost |
512 |
|
133 |
|
| |
– cumulative fair value surplus |
27 |
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The investment property reclassified as property held for sale are properties that the directors have decided will be recovered through sale rather
than through use. The opening balance relates to two investment properties in the retail sector, three investment properties in the office sector
and three investment properties in the industrial sector. In the current year, seven of the investment properties were disposed of for R157 million
and one was transferred back into investment properties as the sale was cancelled.
Sale agreements have been entered into for a further five properties, two in the office sector and three in the industrial sector, with a fair value of
R539 million at year end. |
| 14.4 |
Measurement of fair value |
| 14.4.1 |
Fair value hierarchy
The following table shows the valuation technique used in measuring the fair value of investment property, as well as the significant unobservable
inputs used:
| Valuation techniques |
Inter-relationship between key unobservable inputs
and fair value measurements |
|
| Discounted cash flows: The valuation model considers the present value of net
cash flows to be generated from the property, taking into account expected rental
and expense growth rates, vacant periods, lease incentive costs such as rent-free
periods and other costs not recovered from tenants. The expected net cash flows
are discounted using a discount rate. The discount rate applied is derived using an
appropriate capitalisation rate and adding a growth rate based on market-related
rentals, testing this for reasonableness by comparing the resultant Rand rate per
m2 against comparative sales of similar properties in similar locations. Among
other factors, the capitalisation rate estimation considers the quality of the
building, its location, the tenants’ credit quality and their lease terms. |
The estimated fair value would increase/(decrease) if:
– expected market rental growth was higher/(lower);
– expected expense growth was lower/(higher);
– vacant periods were shorter/(longer);
– the occupancy rate was higher/(lower);
– rent-free periods were shorter/(longer);
– discount rate was lower/(higher); and
– reversionary capitalisation rate was lower/(higher). |
|
The fair value measurement for investment property (including investment property reclassified as held for sale) of R93 574 million (FY14:
R69 913 million) has been categorised as level 3 under the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs to the valuation technique used. Refer to
note 45.2 for the level 3 reconciliation.
|
|